Are Watford's Wranglers getting it Wrong?
When seven players sign for a football club during the close
season, there is often very little made of it. That particular club will more
than likely have either replaced their manager with someone who wants their own
side or have had a poor season previously and are looking at rebuilding.
Not Watford.
Gianfranco Zola has not been sacked and Watford didn’t have
a bad season either, narrowly losing out on Championship promotion via the
play-offs at Wembley in a 1-0 defeat to Crystal Palace.
The Hornets have indeed signed seven players; all in one go,
all from one club and all for nothing.
Nada, zip, zilch.
In what can be described as a ‘crafty’ or ‘creative’,
Watford’s owners, the Pozzo family – who also own Italian side Udinese and
Spanish outfit Granada – have allowed the Hornets to take the Udinese septuplet
(Diego Fabbrini, Gabriel Angella, Almen Abdi, Christian Battocchio, Marco
Cassetti, Davide Faraoni and Javier Acuna) plus Granada’s Daniel Pudil to
Vicarage Road.
Zola’s side finished the Championship season in third place
due to the huge squad at his disposal where he had ten different loanees from the
Serie A club alone. 36 year old Marco Cassetti was moved out on loan to Watford last season on the same day that he signed for Udinese from Roma
![]() |
| Cassetti made 41 appearances last term and never played for Udinese |
If you’re thinking something doesn’t quite ring true, then
you could be right. As well as the fact that the club are under a football
league transfer embargo (which adds ludicracy to this whole situation), it must
be a double edged sword if you are a Watford fan.
While you may get to see some top quality players in action –
Italy international Fabbrini has signed a four year contract – questions will
be raised about the legitimacy and morality of such transfer activity.
The Football League duly clamped down on the loan loophole
which had been abused last season by the Pozzo’s and, as such, clubs can now
only name five loan players in a matchday squad.
However, there is nothing – thus far – which prevents the other
‘inventive’ decision of moving players in bulk between clubs that are owned by
the same party. And herein lies the predicament; rule-breakers are always one
step ahead of rule-makers.
With Cardiff City the most relevant example, we have seen
that some fans are prepared to let their clubs become vehicles for other
motives and ‘sell out’ to foreign investment and respective demands in order to
reach the Premier League.
Whether it is a change in club colours and badge, like
Cardiff, or the exploitation of feeder club tactics employed by Watford’s
owners, the carrot of the top tier of English football is so big that people
will do whatever it takes – from scheming and manipulation – to get there.

There has been no scheming or manipulation involved at Watford - everything that's done is within the rules. So much for "rule-breakers", eh? Even signing that many players from one club is within the rules, and until they change it, the sun is shining, so make hay!
ReplyDelete